![]() |
![]() |
|
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE PRESIDENT'S DIVERSITY PANEL August 15, 2000
B. Recruitment/Rentention of Staff, Faculty, and
Students of
Underrepresented
Groups
The University of Maryland is deservedly celebrated for its success in
increasing the numbers of minority
undergraduate and graduate students and faculty. We can be
proud, for example, that this University is
among the top five (non-historically Black colleges and
universities) to graduate African American PhDs.
And yet, the recent decline in African American student
enrollments, especially at the graduate level, but
also at the level of incoming first-year students, and the
fact that the number of minority faculty has barely
improved in four years, signal the need to reenergize our
recruitment and retention efforts. The Diversity
Panel proposes that the following measures, some of which
have also been identified in the University's
Strategic Plan, be implemented.
B1. Diversity in the Highest Levels of
UM's
Administration. Nowhere on campus is the lack of diversity
more evident than at the highest level of the university's
administration. We urge that diversity be
considered a critical factor in every hiring opportunity at
the vice-presidential level that is currently all white
men.
B2. Targeted and Designated
Hiring. In
order to increase
faculty diversity, we urge increased flexibility in
our hiring procedures. "Target of opportunity" hiring should
be encouraged in all Colleges, and the
means and import to effect this should be made clear and
detailed for department Chairs and more
consistently managed by College Deans. "Designated" hiring
should be approved, especially when the
opportunity exists to recruit senior faculty members. General
advertisements (e.g., The Chronicle of
Higher Education or the newsletters of professional
associations) have not provided adequate notice.
B3. Targeted Fellowships & Visiting
Lectureships. Pre- and
post-doctoral fellowships or Visiting
Lectureships should be established for very advanced graduate
students and recent PhDs of exceptional
promise whom we may wish to hire, but who are still too
junior in their careers to have a research record
adequate to achieve tenure within our 6-year limit. Diversity
(as defined above [see Section I.B: ". .
.Language of This Report], not only race) should be a
criterion for these fellowships; in addition, pre- and
post-docs or Visiting Lectureships should be in departments,
and in the particular research area, where a
hiring opportunity exists. At the end of a fixed period,
departments may request permission for a
"designated" hire, or may conduct an open search for which
the fellow/lecturer may apply.
B4. Expanded, Targeted Faculty
Orientation Program. We
propose an expanded orientation program
for new faculty, run out of the Provost's office, which
continues at least throughout the first year, and
provides new faculty with information that will point them in
the right direction to succeed on our campus
and assists them in establishing supportive
networks. (Orientations should also include diversity training
and a sexual harassment workshop.)
B5. Mentoring Program for Junior
Faculty. We also propose
that mentoring systems for junior faculty be
institutionalized and that Department Chairs assign every
assistant professor, immediately upon his or her
arriving on campus, a senior faculty mentor, and advocate,
who will offer both encouragement and useful
advice for building a record of scholarship, teaching, and
service that will result in the granting of tenure.
B6. Realigning Graduate Student
Support. For graduate
students, we propose the realignment of
financial support to allow the creation of a fund to support
the recruitment of a more diverse group of
graduate students whose records of achievement demonstrate
great potential, although certain criteria,
especially GRE scores, may not reflect this. Prior to the
decision in the Banneker case, grants were
awarded on this basis and were very effective in increasing
the numbers of minority graduate students
who proved to be successful students in our graduate
programs. Although those grants have been
discontinued, they should be re-instituted in another form
that takes into account all forms of diversity (as
defined above, Sec. I.B.), which further the institutionŐs
educational mission, not only that based on race.
B7. Diversity Scholarships for
Undergraduate
Students. Similarly, diversity scholarships should be
created for undergraduate students. These should be based on
merit measured by indicia other than
standardized tests. Other universities within the state of
Maryland have implemented scholarship
programs for students who, in a variety of ways (not only on
the basis of race), enhance the campus's
diversity.
|
|
Office of the President | University of Maryland |
301.405.5803 Main Administration Building, College Park, MD 20742-5025 Maintained by the University of Maryland ElectricPub Comments and questions may be directed to emailum@umd.edu |
|