![]() |
![]() |
|
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE PRESIDENT'S DIVERSITY PANEL August 15, 2000
F. From Diversity to Community
It is important to understand that the stages of progress (in
creating a climate that nurtures a diverse
community) that we have identified are "stages" only in the
sense that without the first, achieving the
second is impossible. However, arriving at a moment when the
second or third stage is reached does not
imply that we can consider further efforts of the kind
expended at earlier stages no longer necessary.
Perhaps a better metaphor would be that of a two-story
house: what we have called "stage one" can be
described as the foundation; "stage two" is the first
floor; "stage three" is the top floor. Were
maintenance of the foundation or the first floor ignored and
these floors allowed to fall into disrepair, the
top floor would collapse. The Diversity Panel recognizes that
the University is building a sturdy foundation
and has been energetic in setting up the first floor. We must
continue our work in those areas, but we are
now ready to move forward, setting to work on completing our
home. This is the third stage: bringing
diverse groups together in community.
F1. Web-based Events Calendar.
We propose that some unit,
perhaps Public Information, set
up and
maintain a website that lists events as far into the future
as they are being scheduled. Already, Outlook
includes a highlighted "diversity calendar." What we have in
mind would expand this calendar and put it
on the web so that units planning relevant events and
lectures would know if there are others with whom
they may work collaboratively, and thereby enhance their
audiences; it would also save units from
scheduling events that conflict with events likely to
interest the same audience. To be effective, such a
calendar should include all events, not only those with a
diversity theme. And the university's home page
should identify the calendar of events clearly so that the
entire university community and the general
public will know how to access the calendar.
F2. Unified Awards Ceremony.
Currently almost every group on
our campus which is interested in some
aspect of diversity presents an award to someone who has
served that group's interests particularly well.
We propose that a unified awards ceremony be instituted so
that the constituencies of all of these
groups, and thus a larger audience with a variety of
interests, is brought together to learn about the
goals of the awarding group and acknowledge the work of the
awardee. Some of these groups may still
wish to hold their own ceremonies, especially if the
presentation of their awards is part of an event of
larger purpose, but even these groups could still participate
in the campus-wide ceremony. These awards
might be presented at the fall Convocation--increasing the
audience and enhancing interest in the
Convocation; or, if that is too unwieldy, the prizes awarded
at Convocation could remain limited to the
presidential prizes and recognition of the newly appointed
Scholar-Teachers and emeritus faculty, while
the other awards could be collectively presented at a second
ceremony in the late spring.
A description of all the awards and the work of all of the
awardees should be published together and
widely distributed on our campus, and perhaps beyond. Also,
following the awards ceremony, an
announcement should appear on the home page which would link
to the texts that introduced the
honorees.
F3. Valuing Diversity to Inaugurate
Every Academic Year. We
came to believe it crucial that diversity
be addressed very visibly at the start of every academic
year.
F4. Continued Coordination of
Commissions & Student
Groups. During the past year, both the
Presidential
Commissions and the various student
identity-based groups met together to discuss how
they might become more aware of the others' concerns and
goals, support each other whenever
possible, and collaborate on programs of mutual interest. In
response to our queries, we have also been
informed that the redesigned Stamp Union will include space
which brings the offices of the various
student identity-based groups into close proximity. These
steps toward inter-group cooperation hold great
promise of effectively moving us from diversity to
community. We urge both the Commissions and the
student groups to continue these meetings and to set up
structures that will institutionalize the practice.
|
|
Office of the President | University of Maryland |
301.405.5803 Main Administration Building, College Park, MD 20742-5025 Maintained by the University of Maryland ElectricPub Comments and questions may be directed to emailum@umd.edu |
|